A. Reymond
To Win
C. Tabur
To Win
Kimmer Coppejans vs Clement Tabur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W W L
Form
L W W W W W W W W WHead To Head: Coppejans 2 - 0 Tabur
They have played 4 sets in total, with Coppejans winning 4 and Tabur winning 0. The last match between Coppejans and Tabur was at the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger, 01-01-2025, Second, Hard with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kimmer Coppejans | 2 |
| Clement Tabur | 0 |
Nonthaburi 1 Challenger(01-01-2025)
6
3
6
3
| Coppejans | Stats | Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| 70% (23-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (23-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 280 | Ranking | 320 |
| 97 | Highest Rank | 202 |
| 31 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 10 |
| 59% (468-330) | Career Total W/L | 60% (278-185) |
| $294,830 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Final
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Clement Tabur
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Clement Tabur
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 11 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:33:14 | Average Match Time | 1:33:14 |
| 65% (67/103) | 1st Serve % | 66% (81/123) |
| 87% (58/67) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (51/81) |
| 50% (18/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (16/42) |
| 33% (6/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 46% (56/123) | Return Points Win % | 26% (27/103) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dominic Stricker
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Norbert Gombos
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Tiago Pereira
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Radu Albot
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
56%
(
67 of
120)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ryan Nijboer
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Izan Corretja
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
46
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
66%
(
77 of
117)
1st Serve %
75%
(
92 of
123)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
49 of
92)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
59 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
63 of
123)
121
Total Points Won
119
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Leo Raquillet
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Maxence Bertimon
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
86%
(
19 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Gastao Elias
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
51%
(
61 of
119)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
119)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Alex Martinez
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Steven Diez
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
69%
(
83 of
120)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
48 of
83)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
41 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Hayato Matsuoka
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Clement Tabur
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (468/330) | Win/Loss | 60% (278/185) |
| 56% (1064/839) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (611/446) |
| 53% (9378/8436) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5275/4647) |
| 62% (140/87) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (84/41) |
| 61% (308/198) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (162/103) |
| 32% (17/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (32/40) |
| 25% (3/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 2143 | Aces Total | 1036 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1801 | Total Double Faults | 1049 |
| 1:28:45 | Average Match Time | 1:35:10 |
| 493.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 447.61 |
| 65% (31296/48499) | 1st Serve % | 61% (16945/27868) |
| 67% (21007/31296) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11370/16945) |
| 49% (8361/17203) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5398/10922) |
| 44% (2355/5411) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1403/3134) |
| 42% (20811/49653) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12094/28422) |
| 52% (34/31) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 28% (11/29) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (293/220) | Challenger W/L | 50% (64/63) |
| 75% (127/43) | Futures W/L | 65% (214/116) |
| 59% (462/785) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (274/458) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (117/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (65/117) |
| 57% (169/297) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (77/136) |
| 84% (435/364) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (261/236) |
| 16% (435/70) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (261/25) |
| 28% (363/103) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (202/42) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
